[Sig makers ONLY rate the sig]

[Overdose]

This thread is similar to the 'Rate the Signature thread'

However:

ஐﻬ Only Sig/Graphic designer or makers, whatever you prefer to call them may post in this thread
ஐﻬ Only post constructive critism, no major flaming
ஐﻬ Spam and Your post will be deleted, so no spamming
ஐﻬ Don't purposely over post here that this thread just becomes spam
ஐﻬ Only post a sig if it is your own work

[GrandShadow]

ok then, i guess i'll start.

i haven't made any in about a month or so but these are considered my best works.

[Overdose]

I give 9.8/10 for the Ulquiorra one : because i feel that its too dark, in my opinion i find that the shadow/darkness on the right side of him makes it go over board. Perhaps if the shadowness warped around his body slightly or if you just kept that side of him lighter.

9.5/10 for the madarame one, i feel it should have a bored and a different font. However i dont particularly like the chosen renders.


my latest, literally made just now. I'm trying to change my style of sig -

[Goldfish]

I can see what you mean by "just now" (looks kind of rushed =P). I do like how the Red and Aqua lines glow on the Render (is that right? I've always just called it the image) and the text placement and colour of "VENGEANCE" is swell, unfortunately "leaves for no happy endings" doesn't stand out as well (I can see you're trying to do a duo colour theme (I think) neato, but unfortunate for that text >.<) and did you trace around the image in the background with a pencil on some places? I kind of like it, it looks like a unique trademark effect one would do to say it's theirs instead of putting in their name ^^
Out of a 10 I would give it something around a 9. Maybe an 8 if I were an absolute hard ass but I'm not ^^
(Hope that's not too much)

Here's my latest, I know I'm missing something but I don't know what it is. Or maybe there is too much of something =\

[Avalantos]

cool concept, bit to dark and plain though. add some brighter colours and greater depth and it would be a greater improvement. - 6.5/10

[Overdose]

10/10
Pulse your signatures are very hard to critique since they are always to perfection. So i'm trying very hard to pick out minor things which i dislike yet its very hard >.<

Damn this is so hard, hmm well to start off id say the person on the lefts had seems to have a unsmoothed edge for the hat. But that really does make much difference. And im not sure if its part of a C4d but it overlaps the mans face slightly (guy on the right) it annoys me a tad, although im not a perfectionist.

But like i said these are really minor things since i cant think of anything to critique on because this sig is somewhat perfect.

[Ventus]

9.5/10- I really like the use of brushes and blurs. One thing, I don't like is the text. It looks a bit creepy, next to the beautiful design. Sorry, I can't describe it better than that.

[KairusMissMurf]

I like the concept of it but it seems a little too spaced out. I"m not sure how else to explain it but there is a lot of empty space for such a tall sig :/ I give it a 7/10.

[Colonel Caboose]

I forgot to resize them, so us some imagination to image a couple of them smaller

I made this one day for legendseeker


another one


I made this out of game sprites I have, this one is a little cheesy. some giant lizards go for some nice toads


here's another one that's a little cheesy. the mario brothers meet the godzilla brothers


smaus aran one, I expect some bad reviews on some, but hopefully a couple of good reviews

[Doc Rocco]

Disclaimer: Mkay. Since this thread is for sig makers, I'll be doing my "professional critique", so if I come off as mean or anything, I'm not being mean. I'm just commenting on your work as a sig maker who's not bad and has a little bit of experience. I'm just saying this as one of my past forums got a little iffy when I did this and didn't mention I was critiquing like this. =]
----------
So I'll number these from one to five. XD
1. It's really just two inverted images on a black background with some plain text. =\ If you rendered the images, good job, though. Also, the text isn't uniformly aligned. I'd recommend using some brushes in the background, and maybe applying some more interesting filters. ^^; 4/10
2. This is just stock with text. D= I can't really see anything else that has been done to it, and it hasn't been saved at high enough quality to prevent artifacts appearing around the text. 3/10. Sorry!
3 & 4. Creative sigs! The top one is a bit large for my liking, but the concept is till good. 7/10 for both.
5. Same as number one. ^^;

Again, sorry if I come off as harsh. I found that not "beating about the bush" when I was reviewed helped me immensely. If you saw some of my original stuff, you'd definitely be able to see. =P
----------
I also see Hope didn't get a rating! Nice composition, and good stock quality. Nice brush use and text placement. Only problem is that I think that the white regions would be better as transparent areas. 8.5/10